correspondence: be at drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents document
Weight: 0.63
, evidence
Weight: 0.60
, matter
Weight: 0.59
, publication
Weight: 0.58
Siblings letter
Weight: 0.66
, statement
Weight: 0.61
, diary
Weight: 0.33
, mail
Weight: 0.33
, computer file
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drawer 1.00
be at your desk drawer 0.93
be at fridge 0.78
be at your desk 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(mail, be at fridge)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(diary, be at your desk)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(letter, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(letter, be at your desk drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(mail, be at fridge) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mail, be at fridge)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(diary, be at your desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(diary, be at your desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(correspondence, be at drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(letter, be at drawer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(diary, be at your desk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(mail, be at fridge)