letter: be at drawer

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents poem
Weight: 0.67
, correspondence
Weight: 0.66
, document
Weight: 0.64
, email
Weight: 0.62
Siblings bank statement
Weight: 0.71
, junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, invitation
Weight: 0.60
, o
Weight: 0.53
, cheque
Weight: 0.49

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at drawer 1.00
be at your desk drawer 0.93
be at bookshelf 0.76
be at desk 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(letter, be at drawer)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poem, be at bookshelf)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(letter, be at drawer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(poem, be at bookshelf)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(correspondence, be at drawer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(poem, be at bookshelf)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(junk mail, be at desk)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(correspondence, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(poem, be at bookshelf)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(letter, be at drawer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(junk mail, be at desk)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(junk mail, be at desk)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(letter, be at drawer)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at your desk drawer)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(letter, be at your desk drawer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(letter, be at drawer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at drawer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(poem, be at bookshelf)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(junk mail, be at desk)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(correspondence, be at drawer)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(letter, be at drawer)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(poem, be at bookshelf)