corruption: be common in african countries

Related concepts

Parents	evil Weight: 0.64 , obstacle Weight: 0.61 , crime Weight: 0.61 , factor Weight: 0.61 , theme Weight: 0.59
Siblings	bribery Weight: 0.35 , terrorism Weight: 0.35 , fraud Weight: 0.34 , poverty Weight: 0.33 , hypocrisy Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be common in african countries	1.00
be common in countries	0.88
affect african youth	0.84
affect south african youth	0.82
be prevalent in europe	0.80
be endemic in nigeria	0.80
be in sub-saharan africa	0.80
be in africa	0.80
be in places like africa	0.79
be high in africa	0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(poverty, be in africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(terrorism, be prevalent in europe) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(poverty, be high in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(poverty, be high in africa)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

Remarkable(poverty, be in africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(poverty, be in africa)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

Remarkable(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Salient(corruption, be common in african countries)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(corruption, be common in countries)

0.69

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(corruption, be common in countries)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(corruption, be common in countries)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Salient(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.18

Typical(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be endemic in nigeria)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.35

Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in countries)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Salient(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.13

Plausible(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Typical(corruption, be common in african countries)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(terrorism, be prevalent in europe)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(poverty, be in africa)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(poverty, be high in africa)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Remarkable(corruption, be common in african countries) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(poverty, be in sub-saharan africa)