corruption: negatively influence society

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.64
, obstacle
Weight: 0.61
, crime
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, theme
Weight: 0.59
Siblings bribery
Weight: 0.35
, terrorism
Weight: 0.35
, fraud
Weight: 0.34
, poverty
Weight: 0.33
, hypocrisy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
negatively influence society 1.00
be in society influenced 0.85
influence social policy 0.82
be negatively affecting businesses 0.82
influence policy 0.82
be in society influenced by schools 0.80
affects society 0.80
be in society 0.79
have positive functions for society 0.78
influence farming 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(factor, influence farming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, be in society influenced by schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(factor, influence social policy)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(factor, influence farming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(factor, influence farming)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(factor, influence social policy)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(bribery, negatively influence society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(poverty, have positive functions for society)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(factor, influence social policy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(crime, be in society influenced by schools) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(factor, influence farming) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(bribery, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bribery, negatively influence society)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(poverty, have positive functions for society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(poverty, have positive functions for society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(corruption, negatively influence society)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(corruption, be in society)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(corruption, be in society)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(corruption, be in society)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(corruption, affects society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(corruption, affects society)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(corruption, be in society)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(corruption, affects society)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(corruption, affects society)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(corruption, negatively influence society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, influence farming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bribery, negatively influence society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(poverty, have positive functions for society)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(factor, influence social policy)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(crime, be in society influenced by schools)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(corruption, negatively influence society) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(factor, influence farming)