cost: be divided into two classifications in process

Property	Similarity
be divided into two classifications in process	1.00
be divided into two main classifications in process	0.98
be divided into two classifications	0.98
be divided into two main classifications	0.95
be divided into two classifications in process costing	0.95
be divided into two main classifications in process costing	0.94

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.83

Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.33

Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.17

Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.06

Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

Parents	operating expense Weight: 0.70 , burden Weight: 0.63 , estimate Weight: 0.63 , variable Weight: 0.62
Siblings	income tax Weight: 0.69 , deductible Weight: 0.65 , tuition Weight: 0.64 , fee Weight: 0.64 , overhead Weight: 0.64

cost: be divided into two classifications in process

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible