cost: be divided into two main classifications in process costing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be divided into two main classifications in process costing 1.00
be divided into two classifications in process costing 0.99
be divided into two main classifications in process 0.96
be divided into two classifications in process 0.94
be divided into two main classifications 0.94
be divided into two classifications 0.92
be considered cost 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications in process)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two classifications)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two classifications in process)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications in process)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two classifications)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process costing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications in process)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two classifications)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cost, be divided into two main classifications in process costing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)