overhead: be considered cost

Related concepts

Parents	cost Weight: 0.64 , equipment Weight: 0.62 , shot Weight: 0.60 , operating expense Weight: 0.59
Siblings	ventilation system Weight: 0.32 , computer hardware Weight: 0.32 , power line Weight: 0.32 , landing gear Weight: 0.32 , utilization Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered cost	1.00
be considered indirect cost	0.86
differ from cost	0.82
differ from fixed cost	0.80
be more relevant than fixed costs	0.79
be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making	0.79
be more relevant than fixed costs in decision making	0.79
be more relevant than costs	0.79
be more relevant than costs in short-term decision making	0.78
be more relevant than costs in decision making	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(cost, differ from fixed cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(cost, differ from fixed cost)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(cost, differ from fixed cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(cost, differ from fixed cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Salient(overhead, be considered cost)

Similarity expansion

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered indirect cost)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(overhead, be considered indirect cost)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered indirect cost)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered indirect cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.59

Salient(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(cost, differ from fixed cost)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(cost, differ from fixed cost)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.79

Typical(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)