cost: be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making 1.00
be more relevant than fixed costs in decision making 1.00
be more relevant than costs in short-term decision making 0.97
be more relevant than costs in decision making 0.97
be more relevant than fixed costs 0.95
be more relevant than costs 0.91
differ from fixed cost 0.80
be considered cost 0.79
is more expensive 0.79
has quality cost 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(tuition, is more expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(tuition, is more expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tuition, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cost, differ from fixed cost)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(cost, differ from fixed cost)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(cost, differ from fixed cost)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(cost, differ from fixed cost)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tuition, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cost, be more relevant than fixed costs in short-term decision making) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)