variable: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.63
, parameter
Weight: 0.60
, term
Weight: 0.60
, operation
Weight: 0.57
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.70
, density
Weight: 0.70
, frequency
Weight: 0.68
, volume
Weight: 0.67
, zip code
Weight: 0.66

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(variable, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(variable, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(variable, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(variable, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(variable, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(variable, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(variable, has quality cost)