cost: be important in business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in business 1.00
be important factor in market economies 0.78
be important in economics 0.77
be important in project management 0.77
be important for government 0.77
be critical to effective project management 0.76
be important in research 0.76
be critical to project management 0.76
be critical to effective project 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(estimate, be critical to project management)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(variable, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(variable, be important in research)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(estimate, be critical to project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(variable, be important in research)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(estimate, be critical to effective project management)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(estimate, be critical to project management)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(variable, be important in research)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(estimate, be critical to effective project)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(income tax, be important for government)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(income tax, be important for government)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(cost, be important in business)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(cost, be important factor in market economies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cost, be important factor in market economies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important factor in market economies)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(cost, be important factor in market economies)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cost, be important in project management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cost, be important in project management)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cost, be important in economics)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cost, be important in economics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in project management)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cost, be important in economics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in economics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in project management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cost, be important in business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(income tax, be important for government)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(variable, be important in research)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to project management)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(cost, be important in business)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(estimate, be critical to effective project)