cost: be in ohio

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in ohio 1.00
be high in california 0.81
be high in america 0.77
is high in america 0.77
be expensive in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be expensive in america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tuition, be high in america)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tuition, be high in america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(tuition, be high in america)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(tuition, be expensive in america)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(tuition, be expensive in america)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(cost, be in ohio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cost, be in ohio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(tuition, be high in america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cost, be in ohio)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(tuition, be expensive in america)