income tax: be high in california

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in california 1.00
be high in india 0.80
be high in uk 0.80
be high in canada 0.79
be high in australia 0.78
be high in ireland 0.77
be high in quebec 0.77
be high in york city 0.77
be high in new york city 0.77
be high in europe briefly 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in california)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in india)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(income tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)