income tax: be high in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in australia 1.00
be high in canada 0.90
be high in uk 0.86
be high in india 0.86
be high in ireland 0.85
be low in singapore 0.83
be high in quebec 0.79
be high in california 0.78
be calculated in india 0.78
be in spain 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in canada)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(income tax, be calculated in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in california)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)