income tax: be calculated in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated in india 1.00
be high in india 0.88
be calculated in states 0.80
be high in australia 0.78
be calculated in united states 0.77
be low in singapore 0.77
be per click calculated 0.76
be high in uk 0.76
be high in canada 0.76
be in france 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, be per click calculated)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cost, be per click calculated)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cost, be per click calculated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, be per click calculated)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(income tax, be calculated in india)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cost, be per click calculated)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(income tax, be calculated in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cost, be per click calculated)