income tax: be calculated in states

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be calculated in states 1.00
be calculated in united states 0.92
be calculated in india 0.80
be for police operations calculated 0.77
be calculated on paycheck 0.76
be per click calculated 0.76
be calculated in regard to mortgages 0.76
measured in dollars 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cost, be for police operations calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, be per click calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, measured in dollars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cost, be per click calculated)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cost, measured in dollars)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(cost, be per click calculated)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(cost, measured in dollars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(cost, be for police operations calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, be per click calculated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(cost, measured in dollars) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(income tax, be calculated in states)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(income tax, be calculated in united states)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in india)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(income tax, be calculated in states)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cost, measured in dollars)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cost, be per click calculated)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(cost, measured in dollars)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(cost, be per click calculated)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(cost, be for police operations calculated)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Typical(income tax, be calculated in states) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(income, be calculated in regard to mortgages)