income tax: be high in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in india 1.00
be calculated in india 0.88
be high in canada 0.87
be high in australia 0.86
be high in uk 0.86
be low in singapore 0.83
be high in ireland 0.82
be high in california 0.80
be high in quebec 0.79
cost computers in delhi 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in india)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(income tax, be high in india) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)