income tax: be high in ireland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents income
Weight: 0.80
, levy
Weight: 0.75
, tax
Weight: 0.75
, cost
Weight: 0.69
Siblings interest
Weight: 0.64
, unearned income
Weight: 0.39
, operating expense
Weight: 0.36
, surcharge
Weight: 0.36
, unemployment
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in ireland 1.00
be high in uk 0.85
be high in australia 0.85
be high in canada 0.84
be high in india 0.82
be low in singapore 0.79
be high in quebec 0.78
be high in california 0.77
be in greece 0.76
be in spain 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(tax, be high in california)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(tax, be high in california) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in ireland)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in canada)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in uk)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in australia)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in uk)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in india)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in india)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in california)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in uk)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in australia)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(income tax, be low in singapore)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in india)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in canada)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in india)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(income tax, be high in california)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in australia)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in quebec)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in australia)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(income tax, be high in california)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in california)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(income tax, be high in ireland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(income tax, be high in ireland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(tax, be high in california)