cost: be sold expense

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents operating expense
Weight: 0.70
, burden
Weight: 0.63
, estimate
Weight: 0.63
, variable
Weight: 0.62
Siblings income tax
Weight: 0.69
, deductible
Weight: 0.65
, tuition
Weight: 0.64
, fee
Weight: 0.64
, overhead
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be sold expense 1.00
is expenses 0.79
affect accrued expenses 0.79
affect expenses 0.78
be sold negative 0.77
be considered cost 0.76
be is paid for 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be is paid for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(income tax, is expenses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(income tax, affect expenses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(income tax, is expenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(income tax, is expenses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(income tax, affect accrued expenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(income tax, affect expenses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(income tax, affect expenses)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(overhead, be considered cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(overhead, be considered cost)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(overhead, be is paid for) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(overhead, be is paid for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cost, be sold expense)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold negative)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(cost, be sold negative)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cost, be sold negative)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(cost, be sold negative)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cost, be sold expense)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(income tax, is expenses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(income tax, affect expenses)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(income tax, affect accrued expenses)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(overhead, be considered cost)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(cost, be sold expense) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(overhead, be is paid for)