course: has quality cost

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents route
Weight: 0.70
, event
Weight: 0.66
, policy
Weight: 0.64
, method
Weight: 0.62
Siblings golf course
Weight: 0.76
, linear algebra
Weight: 0.67
, real estate
Weight: 0.67
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.64
, american sign language
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality cost 1.00
has quality good 0.82
has quality bad 0.81
be in barrhaven expensive 0.77
is expensive 0.77
affect value 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(course, has quality cost)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(course, has quality cost)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(policy, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(policy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(golf course, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(organic chemistry, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(real estate, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(policy, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(course, has quality cost)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(course, has quality cost)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(real estate, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(real estate, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(organic chemistry, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(organic chemistry, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(golf course, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(golf course, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(golf course, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(golf course, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(course, has quality cost)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(course, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(course, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(course, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(course, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(course, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(course, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(course, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(course, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(course, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(course, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(course, has quality cost)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(real estate, be in barrhaven expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(real estate, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(organic chemistry, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(golf course, has quality bad)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(golf course, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(policy, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(course, has quality cost) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)