court: be at ohio

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, school
Weight: 0.64
, settlement
Weight: 0.61
, testimony
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, clerk
Weight: 0.59
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at ohio 1.00
be at michigan 0.88
be at detroit michigan 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(court, be at ohio)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(court, be at ohio)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(basketball court, be at detroit michigan) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(court, be at ohio)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio)

Typical implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(court, be at ohio)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(court, be at ohio) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)