tennis court: be at michigan

Related concepts

Parents	court Weight: 0.68 , playground Weight: 0.65 , golf course Weight: 0.64 , sport Weight: 0.64
Siblings	basketball court Weight: 0.82 , volleyball Weight: 0.65 , supreme court Weight: 0.39 , tennis Weight: 0.37 , tennis racket Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be at michigan	1.00
be at detroit michigan	0.94
be at ohio	0.88
be at ontario	0.78
be popular in america	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sport, be popular in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(court, be at ontario) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Plausible(court, be at ohio)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(court, be at ontario)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(sport, be popular in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(court, be at ohio)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(court, be at ontario)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(sport, be popular in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.11

Plausible(court, be at ohio) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(court, be at ontario) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(sport, be popular in america) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(basketball court, be at detroit michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Salient(tennis court, be at michigan)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

Salient(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan)

Typical implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.20

Plausible(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(tennis court, be at michigan)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(court, be at ohio)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(sport, be popular in america)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(court, be at ontario)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Typical(basketball court, be at detroit michigan)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(court, be at ohio)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(sport, be popular in america)

0.25

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.57

Typical(tennis court, be at michigan) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(court, be at ontario)