court: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tennis court
Weight: 0.75
, school
Weight: 0.64
, settlement
Weight: 0.61
, testimony
Weight: 0.60
Siblings supreme court
Weight: 0.73
, basketball court
Weight: 0.64
, justice
Weight: 0.61
, clerk
Weight: 0.59
, bankruptcy
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at recreational center 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tennis court, be at recreational center) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at recreational center)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at recreational center)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(court, be at park)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(tennis court, be at recreational center) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(court, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(court, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at recreational center)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at recreational center)