tennis court: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents court
Weight: 0.68
, playground
Weight: 0.65
, golf course
Weight: 0.64
, sport
Weight: 0.64
Siblings basketball court
Weight: 0.82
, volleyball
Weight: 0.65
, supreme court
Weight: 0.39
, tennis
Weight: 0.37
, tennis racket
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at recreational center 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sport, be at park)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(court, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sport, be at park)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(playground, be at park)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(court, be at park)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(sport, be at park)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(sport, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at park)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(tennis court, be at park)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(tennis court, be at recreational center)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(playground, be at park)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sport, be at park)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(playground, be at park)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sport, be at park)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(tennis court, be at park)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(court, be at park)