playground: be at park

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.63
, attraction
Weight: 0.63
, place
Weight: 0.61
, project
Weight: 0.61
Siblings park
Weight: 0.67
, basketball court
Weight: 0.66
, tennis court
Weight: 0.65
, soccer field
Weight: 0.61
, amusement park
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at park 1.00
be at recreational center 0.79
be at playground 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at park)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at park)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(soccer field, be at playground)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(soccer field, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at park)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(tennis court, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at park)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(tennis court, be at recreational center) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(soccer field, be at playground) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(soccer field, be at playground)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(playground, be at park)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Salient(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(playground, be at park)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at playground)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(soccer field, be at park)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at recreational center)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playground, be at park) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(tennis court, be at park)