coverage: be with carriers in area

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.58
, factor
Weight: 0.57
, system
Weight: 0.54
, practice
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cover
Weight: 0.32
, reporting
Weight: 0.31
, preview
Weight: 0.31
, medicare
Weight: 0.31
, programming language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with carriers in area 1.00
be with other carriers in area 0.99
be with carriers 0.96
be with other carriers 0.95
be in area 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(coverage, be with carriers)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(coverage, be with other carriers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(coverage, be with carriers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(coverage, be with carriers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(coverage, be in area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with other carriers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(coverage, be with other carriers)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(coverage, be with other carriers in area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coverage, be in area)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(coverage, be with other carriers)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(coverage, be in area)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be in area)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(coverage, be with carriers in area)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(coverage, be with carriers in area) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(coverage, be with carriers in area)