cow: has physical part tails

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.69
, wild animal
Weight: 0.67
, goat
Weight: 0.64
, animal
Weight: 0.62
, beast
Weight: 0.60
Siblings heifer
Weight: 0.47
, pig
Weight: 0.38
, rabbit
Weight: 0.36
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.36
, llama
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part tails 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.82
has physical part horns 0.80
has physical part hooves 0.80
has physical part eyes 0.79
has physical part udders 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(goat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(goat, has physical part horns)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(goat, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goat, has physical part horns)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(goat, has physical part eyes)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(heifer, has physical part horns)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(pig, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part tails)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part tails)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(goat, has physical part eyes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part tails)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(goat, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(pig, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(pig, has physical part tails)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(rabbit, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(rabbit, has physical part tails)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(heifer, has physical part horns) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(heifer, has physical part horns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(cow, has physical part tails)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cow, has physical part horns)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part horns)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part horns)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part udders)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part eyes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part hooves)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part horns)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cow, has physical part udders)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cow, has physical part eyes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part udders)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cow, has physical part eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part udders)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cow, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(goat, has physical part horns)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(goat, has physical part eyes)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(heifer, has physical part horns)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(pig, has physical part tails)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(rabbit, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(goat, has physical part horns)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(goat, has physical part eyes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cow, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)