crack: do

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drug
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dike
Weight: 0.45
, cracking
Weight: 0.35
, cocain
Weight: 0.33
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, methamphetamine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
do 1.00
feel good 0.77
back feel good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cracking, feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cracking, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crack, do)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(crack, back feel good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crack, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(crack, feel good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(crack, feel good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(crack, feel good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(crack, back feel good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crack, back feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crack, do)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(crack, do)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crack, do) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracking, feel good)