crack: back feel good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents drug
Weight: 0.62
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, word
Weight: 0.56
Siblings dike
Weight: 0.45
, cracking
Weight: 0.35
, cocain
Weight: 0.33
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, methamphetamine
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
back feel good 1.00
feel good 0.94
keep coming back 0.83
has quality good 0.77
do 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crack, back feel good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(drug, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(drug, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cracking, feel good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(drug, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(crack, back feel good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(cracking, feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, feel good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(crack, back feel good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crack, keep coming back)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crack, feel good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(crack, keep coming back)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(crack, keep coming back)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(crack, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(crack, keep coming back)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(crack, do)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(crack, do)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(crack, feel good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crack, do)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(crack, feel good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crack, do)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crack, back feel good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(cracking, feel good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(crack, back feel good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(drug, has quality good)