cracking: has quality good

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.60 , process Weight: 0.53 , cause Weight: 0.51 , reaction Weight: 0.50 , characteristic Weight: 0.49
Siblings	crack Weight: 0.35 , tear Weight: 0.32 , rubbing Weight: 0.32 , breaking Weight: 0.31 , mental health problem Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality good	1.00
has quality bad	0.96
has quality change	0.86
be feel good	0.80
feel good	0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(crack, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(crack, feel good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(rubbing, feel good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(characteristic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(breaking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(breaking, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality bad)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(rubbing, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(rubbing, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(crack, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(crack, has quality bad)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality change)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

Remarkable(crack, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(crack, feel good)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(rubbing, feel good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(rubbing, feel good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(cracking, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Salient(cracking, has quality bad)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(cracking, has quality bad)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality bad)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Salient(cracking, has quality change)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(cracking, has quality change)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality change)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(cracking, feel good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(cracking, be feel good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(cracking, feel good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Typical(cracking, be feel good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(cracking, feel good)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(cracking, be feel good)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality change)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be feel good)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(cracking, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.75

Plausible(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(breaking, has quality change)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Typical(crack, feel good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(crack, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(breaking, has quality bad)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Typical(breaking, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(rubbing, feel good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(rubbing, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Typical(cracking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)