breaking: has quality change

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents damage
Weight: 0.59
, crime
Weight: 0.57
, charge
Weight: 0.56
, matter
Weight: 0.52
, problem
Weight: 0.51
Siblings stealing
Weight: 0.31
, cracking
Weight: 0.31
, hacking
Weight: 0.31
, tear
Weight: 0.31
, breach
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality change 1.00
be change 0.88
has quality good 0.86
has quality better 0.86
has quality bad 0.86
is physical change 0.84
be physical change 0.84
has quality news 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality change)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(stealing, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cracking, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hacking, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(breach, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cracking, is physical change)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(cracking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality change)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(stealing, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cracking, is physical change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(cracking, is physical change)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(stealing, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(stealing, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(breach, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(breach, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(cracking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(cracking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(cracking, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hacking, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(hacking, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hacking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality change)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be change)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(breaking, be change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(breaking, is physical change)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality better)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be physical change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(breaking, be physical change)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(breaking, is physical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(breaking, is physical change)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(breaking, is physical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(breaking, be change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(breaking, be physical change)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(breaking, be physical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality news)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(breaking, be physical change)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(breaking, be physical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(breaking, be physical change)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(breaking, be physical change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(breaking, be change)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(breaking, has quality news)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality news)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality news)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality better)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(breaking, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality better)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(breaking, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cracking, is physical change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(stealing, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality change)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(breach, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cracking, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(hacking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(breaking, has quality change) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)