cracker: be on is shit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on is shit 1.00
be on is talking shit 0.93
be on is talking shit about niggaz 0.90
be on is shit about niggaz 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is shit)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit)