cracker: be on is shit about niggaz

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents snack
Weight: 0.59
, band
Weight: 0.57
, item
Weight: 0.56
, staple
Weight: 0.56
, junk food
Weight: 0.53
Siblings chocolate cake
Weight: 0.33
, cookie
Weight: 0.33
, potato chip
Weight: 0.33
, hot chocolate
Weight: 0.33
, pretzel
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on is shit about niggaz 1.00
be on is talking shit about niggaz 0.98
be on is shit 0.90
be on is talking shit 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is shit)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is shit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is talking shit about niggaz)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cracker, be on is talking shit)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is talking shit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(cracker, be on is shit about niggaz)