cracking: be in petrochemical industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.53
, cause
Weight: 0.51
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
, characteristic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings crack
Weight: 0.35
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, rubbing
Weight: 0.32
, breaking
Weight: 0.31
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in petrochemical industry 1.00
be in oil industry 0.86
be in oil refining 0.81
be important in oil refinery 0.79
be in oil refinery 0.78
be in out oil refinery 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cracking, be important in oil refinery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)