cracking: be in oil industry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.60
, process
Weight: 0.53
, cause
Weight: 0.51
, reaction
Weight: 0.50
, characteristic
Weight: 0.49
Siblings crack
Weight: 0.35
, tear
Weight: 0.32
, rubbing
Weight: 0.32
, breaking
Weight: 0.31
, mental health problem
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in oil industry 1.00
be in petrochemical industry 0.86
be in oil refining 0.83
turn mixture from crude oil 0.79
turn mixture from oil 0.78
be important in oil refinery 0.78
be in oil refinery 0.77
be in out oil refinery 0.77
be in crude oil fractions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(cracking, turn mixture from crude oil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(cracking, turn mixture from oil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil refinery)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in petrochemical industry)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in crude oil fractions)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in oil refining)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cracking, be in out oil refinery)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(cracking, be important in oil refinery)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(cracking, be important in oil refinery)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cracking, be in oil industry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(cracking, be in oil industry)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cracking, be in oil industry)