crap: has quality odds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flip flop
Weight: 0.65
, ss
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.37
, hey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality odds 1.00
have odds 0.97
have best odds 0.95
is best odds 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(crap, has quality odds)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(crap, have odds)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(crap, have odds)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(crap, is best odds)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(crap, have best odds)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(crap, have odds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(crap, is best odds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(crap, is best odds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(crap, have best odds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crap, have best odds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crap, have best odds)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(crap, is best odds)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(crap, have odds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(crap, has quality odds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(crap, has quality odds) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crap, has quality odds)