crawfish: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dish
Weight: 0.63
, crustacean
Weight: 0.62
, shellfish
Weight: 0.59
, bait
Weight: 0.55
Siblings shrimp
Weight: 0.37
, lobster
Weight: 0.36
, crab
Weight: 0.35
, spaghetti sauce
Weight: 0.35
, potato salad
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality sin 0.76
has quality questions 0.75
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crustacean, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(crustacean, has quality jokes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, has quality sin)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, has quality jokes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(shellfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(crustacean, has quality jokes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(shellfish, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(shrimp, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(shrimp, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(potato salad, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(potato salad, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(crawfish, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(crawfish, has quality good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(crawfish, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(crawfish, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality sin)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrimp, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(potato salad, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(shellfish, has quality sin)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(crawfish, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crustacean, has quality jokes)