credit card: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents business card
Weight: 0.83
, smart card
Weight: 0.83
, card
Weight: 0.75
, visa card
Weight: 0.71
Siblings debit card
Weight: 0.77
, account
Weight: 0.67
, american express
Weight: 0.63
, password
Weight: 0.61
, visa
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
has quality wrong 0.87
has quality worth 0.82
be considered bad 0.78
seem right overall cheaper 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(business card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smart card, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality worth)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(business card, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(card, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(card, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(business card, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality worth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(american express, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(american express, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(business card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(smart card, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(debit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(american express, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(american express, has quality better)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(american express, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(american express, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(credit card, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(credit card, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(business card, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(card, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(american express, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(american express, has quality better)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality worth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(business card, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(card, has quality good)