smart card: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents credit card
Weight: 0.81
, electronic device
Weight: 0.72
, card
Weight: 0.71
, debit card
Weight: 0.69
Siblings sim
Weight: 0.53
, business card
Weight: 0.43
, sound card
Weight: 0.42
, wild card
Weight: 0.42
, green card
Weight: 0.42

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality wrong 0.85
has quality worth 0.85
seem right overall cheaper 0.77
do get overall 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(debit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(credit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(credit card, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(debit card, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(card, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(debit card, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(card, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(credit card, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(wild card, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild card, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(business card, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(green card, has quality worth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(debit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(credit card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(debit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(credit card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(business card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(business card, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(wild card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(wild card, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(wild card, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wild card, has quality bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(green card, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(green card, has quality worth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(smart card, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(smart card, has quality worth)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(smart card, has quality worth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(smart card, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(card, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(green card, has quality worth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(wild card, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(business card, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(wild card, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(credit card, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(debit card, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(card, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(smart card, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)