creditor: use statements

Related concepts

Parents	financial institution Weight: 0.67 , debt Weight: 0.64 , third party Weight: 0.63
Siblings	mortgage lender Weight: 0.71 , plaintiff Weight: 0.66 , bank Weight: 0.65 , employee Weight: 0.64 , shareholder Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property	Similarity
use statements	1.00
need statements	0.97
use financial statements	0.93
need financial statements	0.90
be interested in statements	0.89
be interested in financial statements	0.86
use financial statement analysis	0.76
use statement analysis	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(employee, be interested in financial statements)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in statements)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need statements)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need financial statements)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(bank, need financial statements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(bank, need financial statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(bank, need financial statements)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(shareholder, need statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(shareholder, need statements)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(shareholder, need financial statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(shareholder, need financial statements)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in financial statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in statements)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(employee, be interested in financial statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(employee, be interested in financial statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(creditor, use statements)

Similarity expansion

0.81

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(creditor, need statements)

0.79

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(creditor, need statements)

0.76

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested in statements)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in statements)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statements)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(creditor, need statements)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statement analysis)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statements)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested in statements)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(creditor, need statements)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.01

Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(creditor, use statement analysis)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(creditor, need financial statements)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(creditor, use statement analysis)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(creditor, use statement analysis)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Salient(creditor, be interested in statements)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(creditor, be interested in financial statements)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.38

Salient(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Plausible(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.01

¬ Typical(creditor, use statements)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Typical(bank, need financial statements)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(shareholder, need statements)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.90

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(shareholder, need financial statements)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(employee, be interested in financial statements)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in statements)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)