creditor: use financial statement analysis

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.71
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.66
, bank
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, shareholder
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
use financial statement analysis 1.00
use statement analysis 0.95
use financial statements 0.86
need financial statements 0.85
be interested in financial statements 0.82
be interested in income statement 0.80
need statements 0.77
use statements 0.76
need accounting information 0.76
use accounting information 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(employee, be interested in financial statements)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need financial statements)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need statements)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(bank, need financial statements)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(bank, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(bank, need financial statements)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(shareholder, need financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need financial statements)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(employee, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(shareholder, need statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need statements)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(shareholder, be interested in financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(employee, be interested in financial statements) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(employee, be interested in financial statements)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need financial statements)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(creditor, use statement analysis)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statement analysis)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(creditor, use statement analysis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(creditor, use statement analysis)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statements)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need statements)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use statements)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in financial statements)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need financial statements)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested in income statement)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need financial statements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(creditor, use statements)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested in financial statements)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(creditor, need statements)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested in financial statements)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested in income statement)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use statements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need statements)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(creditor, be interested in income statement)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need accounting information)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested in income statement)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(creditor, need financial statements)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(creditor, use statements)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(creditor, be interested in financial statements)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(creditor, need statements)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(creditor, need accounting information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(bank, need financial statements)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shareholder, need statements)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(shareholder, need financial statements)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(employee, be interested in financial statements)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(shareholder, be interested in financial statements)