crime: be high in alaska

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in alaska 1.00
be in chicago damn high 0.83
be high in florida 0.83
be high in baltimore 0.83
be high in chicago 0.82
be in chicago high 0.82
be in brazil high 0.79
be high in brazil 0.79
be high in london 0.79
be low in switzerland 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(crime, be high in alaska)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(crime, be high in chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in chicago)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in brazil)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(crime, be high in brazil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, be high in chicago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in brazil)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crime, be high in london)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in brazil)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(crime, be high in alaska) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)