crime: be high in chicago

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be high in chicago 1.00
be in chicago high 1.00
be in chicago 0.97
be in up chicago 0.96
be in chicago damn high 0.95
be high in baltimore 0.86
be high in london 0.82
be high in alaska 0.82
be high in florida 0.81
be in up toronto 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(crime, be high in chicago)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in alaska)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(crime, be high in alaska)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crime, be high in london)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in alaska)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crime, be high in alaska)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(crime, be high in chicago) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, be high in chicago)