crime: was problem in victorian london

Related concepts

Parents	conspiracy Weight: 0.63 , tragedy Weight: 0.61 , action Weight: 0.60 , attack Weight: 0.58
Siblings	arson Weight: 0.70 , sexual harassment Weight: 0.69 , cruelty Weight: 0.68 , pedophilia Weight: 0.68 , drunk driving Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was problem in victorian london	1.00
was problem in london	0.94
be in london	0.91
be in up london	0.89
be high in london	0.88
increase in london	0.86
happening in london	0.85
be problem in america	0.80
be in chicago damn high	0.79
is jackson kevin hart	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(attack, happening in london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(attack, happening in london)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(attack, happening in london)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.25

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.47

Plausible(action, is jackson kevin hart) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(attack, happening in london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(crime, be in london)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Salient(crime, be in up london)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(crime, be in london)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(crime, be in up london)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(crime, increase in london)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(crime, be high in london)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(crime, increase in london)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(crime, be in london)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(crime, increase in london)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up london)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in london)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(crime, was problem in london)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in london)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(crime, be problem in america)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in london)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(crime, be problem in america)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(crime, be problem in america)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(crime, be problem in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(attack, happening in london)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(action, is jackson kevin hart)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(attack, happening in london)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.92

Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(action, is jackson kevin hart)