crystal: be more expensive than glass

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid crystal
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, color
Weight: 0.55
Siblings quartz
Weight: 0.65
, germanium
Weight: 0.63
, amethyst
Weight: 0.63
, hematite
Weight: 0.62
, snowflake
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more expensive than glass 1.00
be better than glass 0.93
be different to glass 0.87
is expensive 0.82
be more valuable than rock 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(item, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(amethyst, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(hematite, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(item, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(hematite, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(hematite, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(amethyst, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(amethyst, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(quartz, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(quartz, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crystal, be better than glass)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crystal, be different to glass)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crystal, be more valuable than rock)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(crystal, be better than glass)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crystal, be different to glass)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(crystal, be different to glass)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(crystal, be better than glass)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(crystal, be more valuable than rock)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be different to glass)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be better than glass)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hematite, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(quartz, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amethyst, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(item, is expensive)