crystal: be more valuable than rock

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents liquid crystal
Weight: 0.64
, object
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.56
, color
Weight: 0.55
Siblings quartz
Weight: 0.65
, germanium
Weight: 0.63
, amethyst
Weight: 0.63
, hematite
Weight: 0.62
, snowflake
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more valuable than rock 1.00
be more valuable than minerals 0.85
is valuable 0.83
be more expensive than glass 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amethyst, is valuable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(quartz, is valuable)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(hematite, is valuable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(hematite, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(hematite, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(quartz, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(quartz, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amethyst, is valuable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(amethyst, is valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(crystal, be more valuable than rock)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(crystal, is valuable)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crystal, be more expensive than glass)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(crystal, is valuable)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(crystal, is valuable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(crystal, is valuable)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crystal, be more expensive than glass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crystal, be more valuable than rock)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(hematite, is valuable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(amethyst, is valuable)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crystal, be more valuable than rock) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quartz, is valuable)