cunt: is bad word

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.37
, whore
Weight: 0.37
, bitch
Weight: 0.36
, shit
Weight: 0.36
, fuck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad word 1.00
is word 0.94
is swear word 0.86
be such dirty word in antarctica 0.85
is offensive swear word 0.81
is most offensive swear word 0.81
is offensive word 0.80
is satisfying word 0.80
be such taboo word in america 0.79
is most offensive word 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fuck, is bad word)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fuck, is word)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fuck, is word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cunt, is bad word)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cunt, is word)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cunt, is word)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cunt, is word)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cunt, is swear word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cunt, is offensive word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cunt, is swear word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cunt, is offensive word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cunt, is swear word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(cunt, is offensive word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cunt, is satisfying word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is offensive word)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is swear word)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(cunt, is satisfying word)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(cunt, is satisfying word)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is satisfying word)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fuck, is word)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fuck, is bad word)