cunt: be such dirty word in antarctica

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.37
, whore
Weight: 0.37
, bitch
Weight: 0.36
, shit
Weight: 0.36
, fuck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such dirty word in antarctica 1.00
is bad word 0.85
is word 0.84
is swear word 0.82
be such taboo word in america 0.80
be such bad swearword outside of uk 0.79
is most offensive swear word 0.79
be such inflammatory word for women 0.78
is offensive swear word 0.77
is most offensive word 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fuck, is bad word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fuck, is bad word)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fuck, is word) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fuck, is word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cunt, is word)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cunt, is word)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(cunt, is swear word)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cunt, is word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(cunt, is swear word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cunt, is bad word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cunt, is swear word)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is offensive swear word)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is swear word)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is most offensive word)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fuck, is word)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fuck, is bad word)