cunt: be such bad swearword outside of uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.37
, whore
Weight: 0.37
, bitch
Weight: 0.36
, shit
Weight: 0.36
, fuck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such bad swearword outside of uk 1.00
be such dirty word in antarctica 0.79
be such taboo word in america 0.78
is bad word 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fuck, is bad word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cunt, is bad word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such taboo word in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such bad swearword outside of uk)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fuck, is bad word)