curator: be at gallery open

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents people
Weight: 0.56
, artist
Weight: 0.54
, critic
Weight: 0.53
, expert
Weight: 0.52
, scholar
Weight: 0.50
Siblings museum
Weight: 0.34
, painter
Weight: 0.33
, exhibit
Weight: 0.33
, historian
Weight: 0.33
, exhibition
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at gallery open 1.00
wants to visit art gallery 0.87
be at museum 0.79
has exhibit 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(artist, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(curator, be at gallery open)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(artist, be at gallery open)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(artist, be at gallery open)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(museum, has exhibit)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(exhibition, wants to visit art gallery)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(exhibit, be at museum)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(artist, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(curator, be at gallery open)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(exhibition, wants to visit art gallery) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(exhibition, wants to visit art gallery)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(exhibit, be at museum) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(exhibit, be at museum)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(museum, has exhibit) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(museum, has exhibit)

Salient implies Plausible

0.09
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(curator, be at gallery open)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(curator, be at museum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(curator, be at museum)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at museum)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(curator, be at museum)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(curator, be at gallery open)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(artist, be at gallery open)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exhibit, be at museum)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(museum, has exhibit)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(exhibition, wants to visit art gallery)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(curator, be at gallery open) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(artist, be at gallery open)