curfew: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rule
Weight: 0.60
, condition
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, issue
Weight: 0.54
, limit
Weight: 0.52
Siblings ordinance
Weight: 0.33
, prohibition
Weight: 0.33
, cardiac arrest
Weight: 0.32
, bail
Weight: 0.31
, sleep deprivation
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is bad thing 0.79
is good thing 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bail, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(bail, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(bail, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(bail, is good thing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(sleep deprivation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(cardiac arrest, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(bail, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bail, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bail, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(bail, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(prohibition, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(prohibition, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(ordinance, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ordinance, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(bail, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(bail, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(prohibition, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(prohibition, is good thing)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(bail, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(bail, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(curfew, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(curfew, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality good)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(curfew, has quality good)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(curfew, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(curfew, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(curfew, is good thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(curfew, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(curfew, is good thing)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(curfew, is good thing)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(curfew, is bad thing)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(curfew, is good thing)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(curfew, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Salient(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(curfew, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sleep deprivation, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(bail, has quality bad)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cardiac arrest, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(prohibition, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(ordinance, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(bail, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(prohibition, is good thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(bail, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(curfew, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(bail, is good thing)